Unschooling Articles from Live Free Learn Free
Standardized
Testing Traps: Ideas for Minimizing the Effects of Tests on Students
by Ann Lahrson Fisher
Excerpted from
Fundamentals
of Homeschooling: Notes on Successful Family Living.
Whaddja get? What is your SAT score? Your achievement
test percentile? Your GPA? Your IQ? If a student has the
right combination of numbers on the right piece of paper, doors open
to that student that will not open to other students, regardless of
general merit. Human potential is reduced to a series of numbers
based on a performance of just a few hours. Those few hours
change lives. Welcome to high stakes testing.
Standardized
tests, at their best, may indicate the progress of large groups against
a bell-shaped curve. At their worst, standardized tests are
used as a deciding indicator of individual progress or group placement.
Do you value
creative thought and imagination, organizational skill, analytic ability?
Sorry, those get but a nod, if that. Moral character, work ethic,
compassion, tenacity and focus? Untested. What about the many
kinds of nonverbal learning? Math, yes, but other areas?
Sorry.
Standardized
tests are minimally useful for measuring individual progress.
Used as a single indicator, the tests can give an idea of a child’s
general performance against predetermined standards of general knowledge.
Even test makers agree that standardized tests excel at measuring
student performance on – standardized tests!
Standardized
tests are well known by educators to be unfair and biased. Test
scores and test taking success have been shown time after time to
be best correlated to parental income or other social status indicators
not related to actual learning. Tests are blatantly or subtly biased
toward a white upper middle-class worldview.
Who decided that
the only worthwhile learning is learning that can be measured digitally?
Is it possible that, in failing to promote “un-standardize-able”
traits, society has systematically created the unexpected and enormous
social dangers our children and grandchildren will face? But,
I digress. Let’s move onto the dehumanizing side effects
of testing.
Dehumanizing
Side Effects of Testing
After administering
standardized tests for many years, first in public classrooms and
more recently to homeschooled students, I am acutely aware of the
drawbacks of this type of testing. As a homeschooling parent, I agonized
over whether to test my children. In all testing venues, no
matter how kindly, I’ve observed that standardized tests teach
significant lessons, lessons that are, if not outright dangerous,
of no benefit to students whatsoever.
The following
messages are the anti-learning, dehumanizing lessons that our children
often internalize when they take standardized tests:
• My worth
can be summarized by a single mark on a paper.
• Thinking is not valued; getting the ‘right’ answer
is the only goal.
• Someone else knows what I should know better than my parents
or I do.
• Learning is an absolute that can be measured.
• My interests are not important enough to be measured.
• The subject areas being evaluated on the test are the only
things that are important to know.
• The answer (to any question) is readily available, indisputable,
and it’s one of these four or five answers here; there’s
no need to look deeper or dwell on the question.
• The purpose of learning is to get a high score. High test
scores are the only purpose of testing.
• If I score very well, I am better than other people who do
not score as well.
• Poor test scores mean that I am a failure. If I score poorly,
there is nothing I can do to change it. Why try?
• I haven’t learned to read yet. I am not smart.
• Since I must be tested once a year so I can homeschool, my
parents and I have to spend the rest of the year preparing.
• The test was too hard. I am not smart.
•
The test was easy. I don’t have to learn any more.
• The test was easy [hard]. Public [home] [private] school kids
are dumber [smarter] than I.
• The questions on the test are what is important. What I have
been studying is not important.
• I have to get a higher score next year to show that I am learning.
• I am just a member of a herd that must be tested, without
individual value.
Do you agree that
standardized tests can be powerful teachers? If so, you must
ask if these are the lessons you want your children to learn.
Minimizing
Negative Side Effects
Despite these
many drawbacks to and negative lessons from testing, I find that I
am a voice crying in the wilderness. Not only is a deaf ear
turned to the drawbacks of testing, the stakes seem to be raised to
a higher level with each passing year.
Until the testing mania reverses itself, many children will need to
take tests to achieve their goals. These suggestions may help
parents minimize the negative effects of standardized testing for
their children.
Unlearn
Negative and Undesirable Attitudes
If your child has already picked up some of those negative side attitudes,
take some time to help her “unlearn” that effect.
Talk about testing and what the testing experience has been like for
her. Sharing your concerns can help your child develop a balanced
perspective about testing.
Use Alternatives
to Achievement Tests
If you must test, can you use a placement or readiness test that evaluates
what the child is ready to learn? These tests are somehow less
terrifying than tests that measure what you may or may not have “achieved.”
If possible, use a narrative evaluation, portfolio, or curriculum
plan to indicate your child’s abilities and knowledge.
Any of these can give accurate feedback about what the child knows,
his capabilities and needs.
Prepare
Gently
Teaching to the test, albeit a much-maligned exercise, is universally
practiced in the high stakes testing game. Some preparation
eases anxiety and familiarizes the students with testing procedures.
Be aware, though, that too much preparation may backfire and create
unneeded anxiety.
You’ll want to seek a balanced approach. For example,
many people schedule a general math review a few weeks before testing
time as part of their normal schedule, but without emphasizing the
upcoming test.
Try to moderate the amount and type of preparation to meet the individual
child’s needs and to avoid deepening test anxiety. Avoid
scheduling tests if stress is high, such as when the child has been
ill or when the family is going through major change.
Taking practice tests can be helpful. Practice tests generally
focus on learning the format of the test. Good practice tests
have the types of items that children can expect to encounter in the
actual test and include tips and suggestions. Give your child
some of the more common test taking tips, including such strategies
as guessing at answers she doesn’t know, considering all of
the possible answers, reading directions carefully, and coming back
to difficult problems later.
Avoid too much preparation and study with young children and first
time test takers. Until children have a strong sense of their abilities
as test takers, work to build confidence instead.
Provide
a Neutral Testing Environment
Consider this: standardized tests were designed to be administered
in the regular classroom by the regular classroom teacher. For
the homeschooled child, the regular classroom is the child’s
own home and the regular classroom teacher is you, the parent.
Your ideal neutral testing environment is right there in your home
with you giving the test.
Unfortunately, it is often difficult, and sometimes illegal, for a
parent to acquire standardized tests to administer to her own children.
If the ideal is simply not available, what is a parent to do?
First, try to find a test administrator who is himself a homeschool
parent. If that is not possible, find a test administrator who
is sympathetic to homeschooling and understands the importance of
having educational options. If you need a sympathetic tester,
a referral from your local or state homeschooling group is a good
bet. You can learn from other people’s errors and successes.
Ideally, ask the tester to come to your home to administer the test.
You can work crossword puzzles or catch up on your reading.
Another possible testing environment is in the home of the tester.
Find a tester who is compatible and who likes children. I have
administered both private family tests and small group (up to six
or eight) tests with good results. Other neutral environments
might include these: a friend’s home, someone’s
office that you can borrow for a few hours, a private study room at
the library, a community room, or a Sunday School room at your church.
The last resort is to have your child tested in a classroom situation,
either privately or at the local public school. The occasion
of taking a standardized test is not the ideal time to introduce your
child to thirty strangers, even if she knows some of the students
or the teacher. For some homeschooled children, an unfamiliar classroom
environment can be quite stressful, detracting from their ability
to focus on the test at hand.
Delay
Testing
Do what you can to avoid testing young children. Children younger
than age eight or nine are widely erratic in their response to a test
anyway, and achievement tests are known to be invalid at early ages.
Late blooming readers may suffer terribly when faced with a test that
demands reading skills that they don’t yet have.
Some children do well on the first grade test but become a bundle
of nervous anxiety by grades three or four. I’ve observed
that, when children do not take tests in the earlier years, they seem
somewhat more at ease when they do take a test when older. I
surmise that avoiding early testing may lessen test anxiety.
Test Less
Often
Avoid annual testing if possible, particularly for young children.
Annual (or, gasp! more frequent) testing causes parents and teachers
everywhere to teach to the test. Don’t blame yourself.
You can’t help it! If your state law requires that you
test your children annually, you may have to work to change the law,
but meanwhile, you may feel a need to teach to the test.
In general, though, test less often (whatever that means to you in
your situation) or not at all. Remember that academic testing
is a rather young phenomenon and its worth, while highly lauded by
some, is far less proven than you are asked to believe.
Test More
Often
I know, I know, I just told you the opposite, so chalk this one up
to a life that is full of contradictions.
More frequent testing is helpful in a few specific instances.
For example, if your older child has extreme test anxiety AND personal
goals that require high stakes testing, taking tests more frequently
can be a good practice ground for him to become more comfortable.
Teens who are confident about testing tend to put the testing chore
in the category of “dumb things I’ve got to do today.”
Sometimes, the only way to turn the MAJOR EVENT of testing into the
CHORE of testing is with lots of practice.
Balance
Your Own Attitude
Are you, the parent, a Nervous Nelly at testing time? Parents
feel that in some ways they, not their children, are evaluated at
testing time. And no matter how sure we are that tests don’t
mean that much, we want children to have a good testing experience.
So, we worry and stress out.
It’s no wonder you feel anxious, but your anxiety may overshadow
your child’s efforts. Stifle your inner Nervous Nelly.
If you can’t keep from obsessing, have your calmer spouse take
the child for the test.
The parents who best prepare their children for test taking are the
ones who are relaxed. When students are older, parents can encourage
them to view the test as a game to be played or a puzzle to be solved.
Trying to figure out what the test writers had in mind intrigues many
teens into putting forth their best efforts.
If you take this approach, remind your child that she is to “play
the testing game” hard, doing her best, but enjoying the process
as well. Then, back off and let your child have her own testing
experience.
Who knows? Maybe your child will join that tiny club of students
who have told me, “I just love taking tests! How
soon can I do this again?”
Selected Resources
Achievement
Testing in the Early Grades: The Games Grown-Ups Play
By Constance Kamii, Ed.
NAEYC
1509 16th Street NW
Washington, DC 20036-1426
(202) 232-8777 (800) 424-2460
fax: (202) 328-1846 resource_sales@naeyc.org
www.naeyc.org
Read this book before you have your very young child tested.
Kamii suggests that the ill effects of achievement testing in the
early years far outweigh any advantage.
Bayside
School Services
PO Box 250
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
(800) 723-3057 (252) 441-5351
orders@baysideschoolservices.com www.baysideschoolservices.com
Testing materials are made available by a homeschooling family to
homeschooling families. CAT/5.
Family
Learning Organization
Kathleen McCurdy
PO Box 7247
Spokane, WA 99207-0247
(509) 467-2552
homeschool@familylearning.org www.familylearning.org
Tests and scoring available, including MAT and CAT.
Scoring Hi
SRA/McGraw-Hill
220 East Danieldale Rd.
DeSoto, TX 75115-2490
(800) 843-8855 (888) 772-4543
fax: (972)228-1982 www.sra-4kids.com
Test preparation materials for K-8. Available for CAT, CAT/5,
CTBS, Terra Nova, MAT 7, ITBS, Stanford
Achievement Test, others.
Seton
Testing Services
Seton Home Study School
1350 Progress Drive
Front Royal, Virginia 22630
(540) 636-9990 fax: (540) 636-1602
info@setonhome.org
www.setonhome.org
Standardized tests, CAT-E Survey, for homeschooled students.
Living a learning lifestyle has been central to Ann’s life
since the birth of her now grown children. This article is an excerpt
from Ann’s book Fundamentals
of Homeschooling: Notes on Successful Family Living, which
explores key learning lifestyle topics such as play, conversation,
togetherness, exploration, and much more. In addition to being a conference
speaker and workshop leader, Ann is working on her next book, “The
Laptop Way to Teach Reading and Writing.”